Merle Allele Instability: Why Offspring May Differ from Parents
One of the most surprising aspects of merle genetics for many breeders is the discovery that merle alleles are not stable across generations. A cryptic merle parent can produce a fully expressing classic merle puppy. A classic merle can produce a cryptic carrier. This instability has profound implications for breeding programmes and underscores why genetic testing of each individual is essential.
The mechanism behind this instability lies in the molecular structure of the SINE insertion that causes the merle pattern. Understanding this mechanism helps breeders appreciate why pedigree analysis alone can never substitute for individual DNA testing.

The Poly-A Tail: Source of Instability
The merle mutation consists of a SINE element inserted into the PMEL17 gene, followed by a stretch of adenine nucleotides called a poly-A tail. The length of this poly-A tail determines which merle allele a dog carries and how strongly the pattern expresses.
The problem is that poly-A sequences are inherently unstable during DNA replication. When the cellular machinery copies DNA, it can "slip" on these repetitive sequences, either adding extra adenines or deleting some. This slippage occurs randomly during the formation of eggs and sperm, meaning offspring may inherit a different length allele than their parent carries.

Observed allele length changes:
- Small changes (1-3 adenines) are most common
- Larger changes (10+ adenines) occur less frequently but are documented
- Both lengthening and shortening can occur
- Changes can shift a dog between allele categories (e.g., Mc to Ma)
- A single parent can produce offspring with different allele lengths
Clinical Implications
The practical implications of allele instability are significant for breeders:
Cryptic to Classic Shifts
A dog carrying a cryptic merle allele (Mc) with a poly-A tail near the upper boundary of the cryptic range may produce offspring whose poly-A tail has lengthened into the atypical (Ma) or even classic (M) range. These offspring will show visible merle pattern despite having a parent with no visible merle. This is compounded by coat colour interactions that can further mask the pattern.
This phenomenon explains some of the "spontaneous" appearance of merle in lines where it was thought to be absent. The gene was present all along in cryptic form, but allele lengthening in subsequent generations produced visible expression.
Classic to Cryptic Shifts
Conversely, a classic merle parent may produce offspring with shortened alleles that fall into the cryptic range. These puppies appear solid-coloured but carry the merle gene and can produce merle (or even double merle) offspring if bred to another carrier.
This is particularly problematic when breeders sell "solid" puppies from merle litters without testing, assuming they are non-carriers. The puppy may actually carry a shortened cryptic allele that will re-emerge in future generations. Informed puppy buyers should always request genetic documentation.
Some breeders assume that if both parents are tested, puppies do not need individual testing. This is incorrect. Because alleles can change length during inheritance, a puppy's actual genotype may differ from what parental testing would predict. Each breeding animal must be tested individually.
Research Evidence
Several research studies have documented merle allele instability across different breeds:
Studies of Australian Shepherd populations found that approximately 3-5% of offspring carried alleles that differed by more than 5 base pairs from either parent. While most changes were small and remained within the same allele category, some crossed category boundaries.
Analysis of large breeding programme databases has shown cases where cryptic merle dogs produced multiple offspring with full merle expression, and conversely, where classic merle dogs produced multiple cryptic carriers across different litters. These findings confirm that instability is not a rare aberration but a regular feature of merle inheritance.
Implications for Testing Protocols
Allele instability reinforces several key principles for testing protocols:
- Test every breeding animal individually - Parental status does not guarantee offspring status
- Request specific allele lengths - Category designations (Mc, Ma, M) are useful but knowing the exact poly-A length provides more information about potential instability
- Be cautious with boundary cases - Dogs with allele lengths near category boundaries may be more likely to produce offspring in adjacent categories
- Test retained breeding stock from every litter - Even if parents are known, puppies being kept for breeding need individual verification
- Educate puppy buyers - Buyers who may breed should understand the need for testing regardless of parental status
Planning for Instability
Rather than viewing instability as a problem to be solved, experienced breeders incorporate it into their planning:
Treat every dog with any merle allele - regardless of length - as a merle carrier for breeding purposes. Whether the allele is cryptic, atypical, or classic, the safe breeding rule remains the same: breed only to confirmed non-merle (m/m) partners. This approach eliminates the guesswork about whether instability might produce a problematic outcome.
The Double Merle Connection
Allele instability has direct relevance to double merle prevention. Consider this scenario:
A breeder has a dog that tests as cryptic merle (Mc) and another dog that tests as classic merle (M). The breeder reasons that since Mc shows no visible merle and M produces only moderate merling, breeding them together might be acceptable.
This reasoning fails to account for instability. The Mc allele might lengthen during inheritance. The M allele might be inherited unchanged. The resulting puppy could carry two alleles both in the classic range (Mc that lengthened + M), producing full double merle health consequences.
The only safe approach is to treat all merle alleles as equivalent for breeding decisions. Cryptic to cryptic breeding carries the same risks as classic to classic breeding.
Documentation Recommendations
Given allele instability, thorough documentation becomes even more important:
- Record exact allele lengths (base pair counts) not just category designations
- Note which laboratory performed each test
- Track patterns across generations to identify any trends in your lines
- Report unexpected results to testing laboratories - this contributes to scientific understanding
- Share relevant information with puppy buyers and fellow breeders
Conclusion
Merle allele instability adds another layer of complexity to an already nuanced area of canine genetics. However, it does not change the fundamental approach to safe, ethical breeding. The key principle remains simple: any dog carrying any merle allele should only be bred to a confirmed non-merle (m/m) partner.
Understanding instability simply reinforces why this rule must be applied without exception. A cryptic merle is not "almost" a non-merle - it is fully a merle carrier with all the breeding implications that entails. By accepting this reality and testing every breeding animal individually, breeders can navigate allele instability without producing affected puppies.
Dr. Patricia Wells
Canine Coat Genetics Specialist
Veterinary geneticist with over 25 years researching coat colour inheritance in domestic canids. Former research fellow at the Animal Health Trust and consultant to multiple breed health programmes across Europe and North America.
View all articles